85 Comments
User's avatar
Billy Ray Capricorn's avatar

Great article but the focus on vaccine caused myocarditis vs infection caused myocarditis is not particularly relevant anymore as vaccinated people are getting infected at equal or higher rates than unvaccinated. If vaccination prevented infection, then the head to head comparison makes sense. But now it’s cumulative: you’re taking the risk of the vaccine induced myocarditis on top of the infection induced. It would also be worthwhile to look at rates of myocarditis after infection for unvaccinated vs vaccinated. And for what it’s worth, Alphonso Davies, as a three-time vaccinated, naturally recovered young male is an interesting case study.

Expand full comment
Morfolino Friend's avatar

I see your point but the incidence of myocarditis after 2 doses of the vaccine is probably the lowest of all because the vaccine protects you from severe symptoms caused by the virus such as myocarditis. An effort to understand what's causing vaccine related myocarditis is needed to determine if non correct administration is its cause. In the meantime caution might be the best solution.

Expand full comment
Billy Ray Capricorn's avatar

I take the point, but do we know that the vaccines protect from myocarditis specifically? They certainly protect from some of the other aspects that can make Covid severe, but I wouldn’t be surprised if the risk of myocarditis is cumulative every time you get a dose of spike protein (whether from the vaccine or the real virus). That seems to be the case and would explain why dose 2 creates more problems than dose 1. Just speculating.

Expand full comment
Joe Collins's avatar

Great points

Expand full comment
Woman in tech's avatar

In Quebec, the vaccine passport will include a mandatory 3rd dose by the summer. The passport will, in a few days, include hardware stores, which were once considered "essential" at the beginning of the pandemic. And there will be a mandatory "significant" tax for the unvaccinated to pay, probably next year, in 2023. What the fuck is going on, if you can pardon my language? 90% of the population is vaccinated already. This Omicron wave we are having now, the vast majority of COVID deaths are happening at home, not in long-term care, not in the hospital. That's weird. Is the same happening in British Columbia?

Expand full comment
Phil's avatar

The authoritarianism in Quebec, which is the only province to enact curfews, appears to be the worst in Canada. Could this possibly have been contributed to by the importation of the legal traditions of France, another jurisdiction that has demonstrated shocking repressions during the pandemic? Unlike the rest of the country which uses the English common-law system, which is considered to place a greater emphasis on individual civil liberties, Quebec uses a code-based legal system derived from France.

Expand full comment
Zionspilger's avatar

If this keeps up it's going to be an interesting Saint-Jean-Baptiste Day this year.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

NAZIism in Queerbec will only work because people are too chicken to fight back.

Expand full comment
Zionspilger's avatar

There's going be self employment opportunities opening up for vaxed gofers.

Expand full comment
Paris Green's avatar

That brings the total to 3 young people, I personally know, who have been diagnosed with myocarditis/pericarditis after the vaccine. My circle of friends/family is not big enough for that to be statistically insignificant.

Expand full comment
Truth's avatar

safe and effective!!!!

Expand full comment
CW's avatar

"Many in the media and medical establishment rightfully promote vaccination to prevent serious illness or death...."

I'd argue the Canadian Ontario data showing hospitalization of vaxies have blown from 25% to 75%, and ICU from 20% to 55% in the last 2-3 weeks.

If you are interested you could look into the Scotland government report - showing vaxies have become worse off (more prone) to catching, spreading, severe illness & death across the board. They had pretty looking stats before December 2021.

https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data?fbclid=IwAR26nYBNjDrvooWNKDr3ifWVAcENjFrlEykSMAVbZu0x4ODIQ2Mz6Zs8D0w

https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11089/22-01-12-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2adisFI6xkeN_6nrYfdCufgtPo2B_Tj0hGyo1PRO3SZmUftoPnxQW7USI

Expand full comment
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo's avatar

When will the WEF show us their giant "lasers"

Expand full comment
Simon's avatar

Best myocarditis hypothesis I've read goes like this: Peoples' anatomies vary slightly. Covid injections must be intramuscular, but a small percentage perforate a blood vessel near the deltoid. Blood vessels in young, lean, muscular males are largeish and close to the surface, so the percentage of inadvertent intravenous injections skews towards this cohort.

This could be avoided by the best practice of aspirating the injection to verify that a blood vessel wasn't hit. Alas, the injections are typically administered production-line style by untrained techs who are instructed to not aspirate.

This rhymes with most covid suppression tactics -- incompetence mixed with malice in equal measure. It should be clear by now that we're not going to vaccinate ourselves out of this, and that on balance, we're doing more harm than good; both on an individual level and population-wide. We're running out of immunologically naive people and risk entering into an infinite recursion of vaccinate/escape. I won't let my teenage son to be vaccinated, needless to say.

Expand full comment
Nonie De Long's avatar

Theory as of yet. Hoffe's D-dimer tests show 62% of mRNA vaxxed have microscopic clotting. https://wellbeingaotearoa.wordpress.com/2021/07/12/d-dimer-tests-show-at-least-62-percent-of-mrna-vaccinated-patients-have-microscopic-blood-clots-reports-dr-charles-hoffe-m-d/

Certainly 62% weren't failure to aspirate. It"s possible it's a ticking time bomb for others. Given the passive reporting system, we don't know.

Expand full comment
Zionspilger's avatar

"This rhymes with most covid suppression tactics -- incompetence mixed with malice in equal measure."

Proportions may vary.

Expand full comment
Mark's avatar

It's a good theory, and it's why I got the J&J when I was forced to vaccinate (or lose my job), but I'd love to know how the 2nd dose causing higher rates of myocarditis fits.

Expand full comment
GW's avatar

Excellent piece. An area I am concerned is those same young male at risk group, who got covid, and are now on the vaccine doses. As many colleges are forcing kids that have natural immunity into three shots.

Expand full comment
Texas Teri's avatar

My son is in that category. He is a college freshman at a US university requiring a booster of all students, regardless of whether they have natural immunity and despite the risks of vaccine injury. My pleas to the administration have fallen on deaf ears.

Expand full comment
GW's avatar

I am in the exact same fight, college forced 3rd shot, even after having it and against the advice of his doctor in writing.

Expand full comment
Martha's avatar

I understand the dilemma. Is life and health worth the risk?. The whole system needs a change. Education is the first stronghold we must overturn.

Expand full comment
HelenaEmilia's avatar

All those bureaucrats of universities and sports associations, whom force young people to get vaccinated, have civil and criminal responsability.

Expand full comment
D. Malcolm Carson's avatar

A big part of the fallacious "fact-checking" of Joe Rogan's foray into the myocarditis from vaccine versus infection discussion is that comparing infection-caused myocarditis rates with vaccine-caused myocarditis rates is apples to oranges because not getting vaccinated does not ensure that a person does not get infected, nor does not getting vaccinated ensure that they do get infected. But getting vaccinated 100% ensures that the person will experience the risk of mycarditis from vaccination. So the right "apples to apples" comparison would be a population-level analysis between myocarditis cases among the "never vaccinated" and mycarditis cases among everyone else, broken down of course by demographics. I've never seen that study.

Expand full comment
Luke's avatar

Well said. I've been struggling to figure out how they calculate these rates. I'm unvaxxed and was thoroughly exposed to COVID when my wife got it, but experienced no symptoms at all so didn't bother getting tested. If COVID complication rates are defined as "per infection," I wouldn't be included in the denominator, but the more meaningful metric to compare to the vaccines would be "per exposure." Are there any studies attempting to estimate myocarditis risk on that basis?

I see no reason to be worried about long-term COVID complications for myself when the virus didn't even make me sick. I would have to be confident that my risk from the vaccine is *zero* in order to get jabbed.

Expand full comment
Nonie De Long's avatar

Difficult to calculate but yeah, this is the analysis I'd like to see.

Expand full comment
D. Malcolm Carson's avatar

Apparently, it's not an oversight that we haven't seen those data, it's deliberate: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/20/health/covid-cdc-data.html

Expand full comment
Nonie De Long's avatar

Agree.

Expand full comment
Jose Soares's avatar

Congratulations on the article. It's like in Andersen's folktale "The Emperor's New Clothes". Someone has to come and say: Hey, the Emperor is wearing nothing at all, people are being fooled.

Expand full comment
Zack's avatar

Exceptional well balanced thanks you. Take away is 15 to 24 should understand risk of vaccine higher than infection from Covid infection. What about 0-14, I am deeply concerned about mounting pressure to vaccinate my 8year old twins who are healthy.

Expand full comment
SharonNZ's avatar

Resist at all costs. The data showing bad things happening is becoming louder and louder.

Expand full comment
Richard's avatar

Covid is FAKE. Please provide a study where the fake virus has been physically isolated. The VAXX bio weapons are of course real.

Expand full comment
Louis Shulman's avatar

You are doing very important work. Please keep going.

Expand full comment
Phil's avatar

This is f'ing fantastic, Rav. Well done. However, it's not clear to me why you didn't refer to the December 5, 2021 preprint study from Ontario (reviewed by Vinay Prassad here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzVoS-1TIWI&t=38s&ab_channel=VinayPrasadMDMPH ), which indicated the rate of myocarditis can be as high as *777* per million in men 18-24 who receive two vaccine doses, significantly higher than the 1 in 2000 (or 500 per million per Clinton Condon's comment) referred to in the study by Katie Scharff you mentioned. Also, re the graph you included from the Nature Medicine article, if you include graphs from other publications that do not adequately label the x and y axes (no units for the y and no labels re brand, e.g., Moderna, for the x), may I suggest you provide that information in your article?

Expand full comment
Clinton Condon's avatar

Great article. Completely agree with your conclusions. Just a minor note—1 in 2000 amounts to 500 per 1 million.

Expand full comment
Rav Arora's avatar

You're correct. I was basing 200/million based on the estimate of 1/5,000 - which I now think is not right.

Expand full comment
Truth's avatar

a few private schools in America with 250-300 students have saw 4-5 case in each school.

Couldn't tell you which ones i just remember reading about it a few months ago.

Expand full comment
Carolin's avatar

Steve kirsch wrote about one school in California

Expand full comment
Rational Person's avatar

From the Oxford study you site:

"We estimated extra myocarditis events to be between 1 and 10 per million persons in the month following vaccination, which was substantially lower than the 40 extra events per million persons observed following SARS-CoV-2 infection."

"Whilst myocarditis can be life-threatening, most vaccine-associated myocarditis events have been mild and self-limiting. The risk observed here is small and confined to the 7-day period following vaccination, whereas the lifetime risk of morbidity and mortality following SARS-CoV-2 infection is substantial. Indeed, myocardial injury is very common in persons admitted to hospital with SARS-CoV-2 infection."

Expand full comment
ahvc's avatar

Thank you for your service. You are a patriot!

Expand full comment